Archive for September, 2009

UK Music Tour Contest

Tuesday, September 22nd, 2009


Category: Music

MEmusic, the Amazing Tunes-powered music sharing site from Metro newspaper, is running a competition to find the hottest new music talent in the UK. They’ve teamed up with Island Records and Nissan QASHQAI for On-line and On-tour ‘09. The prize is fantastic: a 12-date tour with one of the most exciting acts of the moment, V.V. Brown. And that’s not all. If you win, you’ll also get studio time to record your winning track which will then get a digital release through Island Records.

All you need to do is register with MEmusic: http://memusic.metro.co.uk/onlineandontour (if you’re an existing member, simply log in), upload your track, nominate an Island Records cover from the latest Island artists’ new releases and wait to be called to a regional final.

There are 5 live finals around the country being hosted by Barfly:
Kingsway, Cardiff on 28/09/09
Masque, Liverpool on 30/09/09
Barfly, Chalk Farm, London, 02/10/09
The Junction, York, 03/10/09
The Arches, Glasgow, 04/10/09

If you reach the final, you’ll need to perform your original track plus the Island Records cover you’ve nominated. Your performance will then be judged by an Island Records representative, a Barfly representative and the audience.

The winners of the regional finals will go to a public vote with Metro readers deciding who wins the big prize.

For your chance to take part in this amazing competition, go to http://memusic.metro.co.uk/onlineandontour.

Monday Inspirations vBlog - The Skid Mark Kid

Monday, September 21st, 2009

Monday Inspirations

Monday, September 21st, 2009

j02276702.jpg

Monday InspirationsHere are 3 weekly ideas for song lyric, poems, instrumental titles, photos, video, short story or anything they inspire you to create.  Use the title if you like & make something!

58.  Shake Your Pickle
While putting fresh picked organic green beans into the refrigerator I noticed Karl’s 2 gallon jars of refrigerator pickles and wondered - Has he been shaking his pickles?  After you mix the pickle brine and put the cukes in, you are supposed to shake the jars regularly.  It was a funny thought.  Shake Your Pickle:-)

59.  The Skid Mark Kid
Years ago I wrote three short children’s stories about being good kids.  My daughter and two other teens went into the recording studio and we recorded them reading the stories.  One title was The Skid Mark Kid inspired by my son’s story of riding his bike through the Interstate overpass Burger King.  It’s a great title for a children’s poem, song, story and certainly anything visual. 

60.  FRENZY
When I first started songwriting with a certain Maestro, he would e-mail me “I stayed up until 5am working on this song… you’d better like it…”  There was such FRENZY in his aura I could feel it ten thousand miles away!!!  We’ve all had a little taste of FRENZY.  What did yours sound like? 

An Emerson Quote

Monday, September 21st, 2009

picnic-table.jpg

Ralph Waldo Emerson states, “Don’t waste life in doubts and fears; spend yourself on the work before you, well assured that the right performance of this hour’s duties will be the best preparation for the hours and ages that will follow it.” 

Call For Italian & Thai Tracks - Music Dealers @ Chicago

Saturday, September 19th, 2009

1192851233_m.jpg

New Music Dealers Opportunities

Hey Guys,

There are new opportunities on the Deal Board at www.musicdealers.com/deal-board.

*Italian Tracks Needed
*Thai Tracks Needed
 

Remember, you can submit songs from your profile and from the Deal Board by clicking the details arrow and selecting submit to job.

-Your Friends at Music Dealers

Monday Inspirations vBlog - BREAK IT FAST!

Saturday, September 19th, 2009

Monday Inspirations - BREAK IT FAST! - vblog

Direct to Fan: Creating an Effective Offer Page and Fan Acquisition Techniques by Mike King

Thursday, September 17th, 2009

Friday, September 11, 2009, 2:57:23 PM | mkingGo to full article

Anyone that has been following music business trends for the past few years is likely familiar with the high profile direct to fan campaigns (campaigns that focus on the monetization of an artist’s fan base directly) that Nine Inch Nails, Radiohead, Imogen Heap, and others have been involved with recently. As Mike Masnick put it in his 2009 NARM Keynote, the recipe for effective direct to fan campaigns can be boiled down to: Connecting with Fans (CwF) + Providing a Reason to Buy (RtB) = $$$. Makes sense, right? The difficulties arise when you consider that there are 5 million bands on MySpace, all of which are vying for the consumer’s attention. It’s easy for NIN and Radiohead to connect with fans, the skeptics’ note, as they have had years of major label support and hundreds of thousands of existing followers to work with. How can a developing artist in this climate differentiate themselves from all the other bands out there?

The answer can be slightly more nuanced than Masnick’s formula above, and to me, is based on a four key elements: 1) setting up an effective offer page on your site that is tailored to your marketing goals and where you are in your marketing cycle, 2) expanding your digital touch points through creative fan acquisition techniques, 3) integrating your online and offline marketing towards the same goal, and lastly, 4) once you’ve created your groundswell of support and fans, integrating effective 3rd party digital and physical marketing, sales, and distribution (such as Tunecore) outlets into the mix. Let’s illustrate these elements with two examples.

Example 1: Fanfarlo

Creating an Effective Offer Page Tailored to Acquisition

Although they were supported by NME in their hometown of London (who have called their release “a carefully orchestrated treat”), and have some high profile fans in the members of Sigur Rós, Fanfarlo found that they were having a tough time breaking into the US market. Fanfarlo’s music is undeniably great (aside: the first step, of course, in any marketing campaign is to have great music. Without this, any DTF marketing campaign will fail), and as such, the plan for breaking Fanfarlo relied a lot on getting as many folks to experience their music as possible, with the end goal of gaining enough interest to pack the Mercury Lounge in NYC (300 capacity).

The band initiated their acquisition-based campaign by looking at what assets and connections they could leverage. Fanfarlo developed a low-cost video, dug up some unreleased tracks, and recorded new acoustic versions. Of particular note, the band’s management reached out to Sigur Rós, who agreed to mention Fanfarlo in one of their emails to their fans.

Prior to any outreach from Sigur Rós, the band knew it was crucial for them to create an offer on their site that would make their music as accessible as possible, while at the same time create a degree of urgency. Again, as monetization was not the driving force behind their campaign at this stage in their marketing process, Fanfarlo decided the best course of action for building up their base was to provide curious potential fans with the opportunity to purchase their record for $1.00 (for a limited time), in exchange for an email address (which provided the band with permission to engage with these fans directly at a later date). They band adjusted their site accordingly, employing best practices with SEO and Web IA, and created an offer page dedicated to highlighting their music and making it easy to purchase via one click off the offer page. This was the result:

Along with the redesigned offer page on their site, the band adjusted all of their social media pages (visibility on MySpace, Wikipedia, Facebook, Last.fm, iLike, YouTube) with appropriate offer copy/images, and links to the offer on their proper site. Once all the backend was done and Fanfarlo was ready for the traffic, Sigur Rós hyped the band in an email to their fans and Fanfarlo essentially had an “offer you can’t refuse” waiting for them. In exchange, the band built up their email list, created a viral buzz on their new record, and not only had enough interest to pack the Mercury Lounge in NYC, they had to upgrade to the larger Bowery Ballroom!

Example 2: The Lights Out

Expanding Your Digital Touch Points through Social Media & Integrating Your Online and Offline Marketing

All marketing campaigns are different, and not everyone has the luxury of having support from major bands like Sigur Rós. But no matter where you are at in your career, core marketing principals hold true, particularly when it comes to effectively using social media to engage your fans and building up your base. The best example of social media campaigns are creative ideas that leverage the viral nature of social media to engage fans and effect change in not only the digital world, but in a band’s physical campaign as well (which of course is still incredibly important to any overall marketing campaign).

The Lights Out is a Boston-based band working to raise their hometown visibility and acquire new fans to positively impact their touring base throughout the Northeast. On the heels of an oppressive heat wave in Boston in mid August, the band initiated a Slush Puppie “flash mob” online marketing campaign. The band found the appropriate location for the event via polling their Twitter followers:

Once the location was chosen, the band set up a Facebook event, which allowed them to update the status of the Slush Mob, get an idea on who was coming, and communicate directly with those that expressed interest.

The band then set up a Twitter hashtag (#), which organized all messaging around the event into a single live channel on Twitter search. The hashtag use also had the all-important added benefit of becoming a “viral generator” for the event, piquing the interest of the band’s follower’s fans, and influencing activity at a level outside of what the band could do with their fanbase directly.

Once the existing fans were engaged in the event, Boston-based bloggers picked up on it, the market’s alternative weekly featured info on the event, and popular Boston-based event and social media Twitterers did the same.

The band continued Tweeting from the event and after, and shared photos of the turnout using Twitpic:

So, what did all this mean to the band’s stated goal of raising their visibility and acquiring new fans?

The data:

• 20% increase in unique web site visitors

• 24 times increase in daily twitter followers

• 3,352 impressions from media coverage

• 66,160 impressions from Tweets and Retweets

• 195 impressions from Twitpics

• Approximate Total: 70,000 impressions

New fans also direct-messaged the band, telling them how much they enjoyed the idea/their music and expressing interest in attending future gigs. And because this social media campaign included an offline component, new fans were able to bond with the band in a more personal way.

Again, all marketing campaigns are different, and should be employed in a way that focuses on the strengths and opportunities of the respective band. The specific tools will certainly continue to change as we move forward, but the principle of determining your core goal and engaging / developing your fan base to reach this goal will not. What’s particularly exciting to me is that artists have the option to market and distribute their music directly, with less gatekeeper involvement, than ever before. We’re in the early stages of direct to fan campaigns, but I think it is undeniable that there is a tremendous amount of growth potential in the segment – and is an area that artists, managers and others (forward thinking, artist-serviced based companies, for example) have to look at very closely.

How To Get Your Music in TV and Film by Mike King

Thursday, September 17th, 2009

 Berkleemusic Blog Network

  • How to Get Your Music in TV and Film

  • The live events at SXSW are amazing. Because of the limited time allotted to most bands (which I think encourages bands to “pull out all the stops”), and the fact that the barrier of entry is pretty high, you’d be hard pressed to find another convention anywhere in the world with as much concentrated talent in one location.

    Complementing the live music scene at SXSW are panels held throughout the week at the convention center. From Jim Griffin talking about his Choruss idea, to Ian Rogers moderating a panel on “Making a 360 Deal with Yourself,” the overall theme of the panels I attended this year revolved around the ways that artists and music business companies can identify and optimize alternative revenue models as the music business shifts away from traditional record sales. Music licensing, while nothing new, is a hot topic right now among content owners (songwriters, labels), managers, and artists. Licensing offers the possibility of incredible visibility to artists, and depending on usage, it could also provide a fairly solid revenue stream.

    Here is my takeaway from the “Placing Your Music in Film and TV” panel with Jennifer Czeisler (VP Licensing, Sub Pop Records), Marianne Goode (VP Music, Lifetime Networks), Season Kent (Music Supervisor, Relativity Media LLC) Alexandra Patsavas (Owner, Chop Shop Music), Alicen Schneider (VP Music Creative Svcs, NBC Universal TV Music), and Madonna Wade-Reed (Music Supervisor, Whoopsie Daisy):

    It’s a Good Time to License Independent Music

    The panelists all agreed that it was a fantastic time for independent artists to look for licensing deals, simply because of economics. Producers are more open to indie music, as A) indie music is typically cheaper to license, and B) many producers consider themselves tastemakers, and want to be known for breaking bands. Alicen Schneider spoke about the fact that 75% of the music used by NBC is now independent music.

    How Much Can Artists Expect to Get Paid?

    There is a wide range in the amount of money artists can expect to get paid from a licensed track, much of which depends on usage. Variables include the length of the use, the thematic placement (is the song in the credits or in the background of a scene?), the budget of the production, if the song is for a one-time use or used as a recurring part of the promo for the production, and more. The more that is requested of the song, the more the song will be worth. It’s important to also note that when a song is used in TV or film, two licenses are needed: a synchronization license from the copyright owner of the music, as well as master recording license from the copyright owner of the sound recording. These are two separate agreements, and typically, artists that control both their master rights as well as their publishing will do “All in” deals that cover both “sides” of the composition. According to Jennifer from SubPop, artists can expect to receive anywhere from $1,500 to $15,000 for the master rights alone for one-time placements.

    Dos and Don’t: Rules for Submissions

    Similar to traditional press, blog, or radio outreach, there are specific rules that artists should follow when pitching supervisors. Once you find the name of a specific supervisor that you want to target (the Music Business Registry is a good option for finding contact info), your package should follow these guidelines:

    1) Although they take Mp3 files in emails, supervisors still primarily work with full art CDs. They prefer their music in proper jewel cases with a spine that lists the artists name and title. Madonna from Whoopsie Daisy (who has worked on “Smallville,” “One Tree Hill,” “Alias,” and “Felicity,” and others) said that she receives upwards of 150 submissions a week, many of which she files away. Artists have to make it as easy as possible for them to file your music, and find it later.
    2) If you are burning a CD, be sure you have added all the track info to the individual songs (particularly artist and song names). If a supervisor burns your music into iTunes, you don’t want to be in their library as “Track 2.”
    3) Clearance problems are always an issue. Make the publishing and master info as prominent as possible, especially if you control both.
    4) Be sure you are targeting the right show. Supervisors hate emails that ask: “What are you looking for?” Know your show’s demo, and send them appropriate music.
    5) Do Not Call. Supervisors have no time to spend on the phone. Quick email reminders are appropriate. Successful pitches are those that do not expect anything, and do not put too much pressure on the supervisor. Keeping in front of them is great; stalking them is not.
    6) Do not ask them for opinions on your music. Supervisors are not A&R reps. Good music will stand out and get placed at some point.

    Use Songpluggers

    All supervisors have a trusted stable of songpluggers that they can go to in a pinch. Songpluggers (or independent licensing companies) have relationships with all the supervisors in LA, know what their taste is in music, and can provide cleared music to them, which they can run with immediately. Indie artists should look into building a relationship with licensing companies that have these direct connections with the supervisors. However – do your homework on them. Like any promo area in the industry, there tends to be some false claims and embellishments. Learn more about songpluggers here.

    Music Licensing is Insanely Competitive

    The labels are keenly aware of the importance of music licensing. Alicen Schneider related a story about Dave Matthews’ label sending Dave himself to play a one-on-one concert for her to showcase some of his new license-friendly music. But the bottom line is that if artists can find fans of their music in the supervisor, (or sometimes even a key actor, as was the situation with Death Cab for Cutie and their placements in the O.C.), indie bands have as much of a chance as a major label artist (if not more, with the smaller budgets) with success in music licensing.

    The VMA Awards - by Bob Leftsetz

    Thursday, September 17th, 2009

    The VMAs

    Madonna was narcissistic, Kanye demonstrated he knows no limits, the Michael Jackson tribute was lacking oomph, a neutered Russell Brand was strangely unfunny, but none of that truly mattered.  What we saw last night was a television network that was once different, playing to a disenfranchised younger generation, employing the same damn playbook as the networks.  And have you caught the networks’ ratings recently?

    In an era where the niche is king, where the mainstream is shrinking, MTV tried to be all things to all people.  Like a cheerleader being nice to the nerds for a few hours.  But didn’t MTV get the memo, THE NERDS RULE!

    MTV established a monoculture.  There was no longer an underground, there was no FM to compete with AM, it was what MTV played and everything else, winners and losers.  And to think it was about music is to believe visual stimulation holds no weight, that seeing Britney Spears shake her hips titillates you not a whit.  MTV was the paragon, driving hell-bent into the distance, defining youth culture, for those truly young and those who desired to be young.  But, MTV never saw the cliff ahead, never saw the nascent Internet, a village off to the side.  Hell, the whole entertainment industry didn’t see the Internet and still doesn’t.

    Suddenly, we’re back in the sixties.  You’re either with us or against us.  Either you’re wired or your irrelevant.  Either you can tweet, update your social networking site and text all at the same time, or you’re hopelessly out of date.

    Facebook and Twitter are tools.  Frameworks wherein individuals place their content, not for everyone, but for their accumulated mass, which could be two or three or a few thousand, but which is rarely millions.  If Whitney Houston can be all over mainstream media and only sell three hundred thousand albums in a country of three hundred million, do you really think the mainstream counts?  The mainstream has become a sideshow!

    We had VJs fawning over irrelevant pop stars.  Lady GaGa changed outfits so many times she insured she was perceived as a joke.  Hell, she could barely talk with her neck propped up in a medieval torture device and one eye covered like the Phantom, and when she won her damn award, she had to pull off her Spider-Man mask to speak.

    Green Day and the house band proved that music doesn’t work on TV.  And Muse was just a joke.  Real band, trying to merge old with new, refuses to lip-synch so ends up sounding terrible on TV.  Did Muse really need this opportunity? Does anybody need TV?  Don’t they see that you’re inherently subservient to the medium?  That television flattens everything, that all content is grist for the mill?

    Madonna, barely looking like herself, made her Michael Jackson tribute about her.  Like we still care about what she has to say, like we’re still in thrall to her throw it all out there, be naked, manipulative persona when millions are revealing their truth online, girls are e-mailing topless photos, it’s like grandma showed up to scold her grandkids, telling them you’ve got to do it her way, dammit.

    Kanye…  All the celebrities castigating him today.  You won’t stand up for health care, you won’t risk alienating a single potential fan, but you pile on Kanye when the audience knew he was an egomaniac with no limits years ago?  This is news?

    No, this is the kind of moment MTV lives for, the unscripted.  But we used to have RuPaul in a tete a tete with Milton Berle.  Now, we’ve got someone who loves the spotlight so much I’m stunned he doesn’t go door to door, telling everyone how fucking great he is.

    Janet Jackson…  Explain what your talent is again?  You shook your surgically enhanced breasts and shapely body to beats crafted by Jimmy Jam and Terry Lewis, you’ve got no innate talent.  As for those dancers replicating Michael Jackson’s moves to the big screen presentation of “Thriller”, it reminded me of nothing so much as a screening of the “Rocky Horror Picture Show”.

    And the closing moment with Jay-Z?  This is supposed to drive patrons to the live gigs?  Explain to me how this works in an arena again?  People go to share what the albums mean to them, feel the energy, but what comes out of the speakers…is barely comprehensible.

    And Green Day complaining that MTV should play more videos?  Even Tom Freston, who ran MTV, told me years ago that MTV was never going to play more videos, that clips were an on demand item on the Web.  He got fired, but do you really think people are going to sit in front of the box and wait for their favorite video to appear?

    Kings Of Leon were nominated, but they didn’t win.  Because they’re not visual enough, on MTV it’s about train-wreck, not music.

    Wilco, the critics’ band, they were nowhere in attendance either.

    Rather this was a party.  A made for television event.  With sponsors woven into the script (Verizon Wireless anyone?) so a big bad corporation, Viacom, can add to its bottom line.  But have you checked Viacom’s bottom line recently, it’s awful!

    If you thought the show sucked, you’re right.  But what you fail to grasp is the silver lining inside all this crap.  Yes, if it’s this bad, what are the odds something better will appear?

    EVERYBODY knows the show sucked.  It was just a Sunday night diversion.  With trained seals clapping at appropriate moments to give you the impression that what was going on was important, like on a game show.  But it had nothing to do with music.

    MTV is about fame.  For a while there, the two merged, music and fame were interwoven.  But then fame came to rule. Look good, be a pawn in our game and we’ll hook you up with songwriters and stylists, we’ll create a product that will make you famous!  But is that really why anybody picks up an instrument?  For fame?  Is there no reward in music?

    Today, when the fame game pays fewer dividends than ever before, we’ve got whores who are trying to hold on to the little that’s left of the old paradigm, and newbies who’ve chucked it all, who are trying to make it on what comes out of the amplifiers, not what you see on the screen.  The only people who have not caught on are those in the mainstream media, flogging each other’s products like they truly matter.  But if NBC is putting Jay Leno on in prime time, and can make money and will be satisfied with a 1.5 rating, which is fewer than 2 million households, does it really make sense to overpay to produce this tripe that so few are truly interested in, that generates less revenue than ever before?

    It’s about music.  It’s about generating an audience the old-fashioned way, through hard work and what comes out of the speakers.  Getting lucky on TV doesn’t work, because no one’s paying attention, the active audience is in front of the computer screen, or focusing on their phone as opposed to passively sitting in front of the box.

    That’s the revolution the oldster media just doesn’t get.  The days of passivity are done.  We’ve got an active audience. Which is engaged by truth.  All we saw last night was phoniness, an irrelevant train-wreck with the nutritional value of Froot Loops.  You didn’t miss a thing.

    ASCAP & BMI NONSENSE!

    Thursday, September 17th, 2009

    Sep 17, 2009

    Music Industry Wants Royalties From iTunes 30 Second Samples

    Music Industry Wants Royalties From iTunes 30 Second Samples
    By Adam Frucci, 11:30 AM on Thu Sep 17 2009, 5,906 views

    Dear music industry: go fuck yourself.

    Music royalty groups ASCAP and BMI are harassing online music stores such as iTunes to pay performance fees not only for the songs that they sell, but for the short clips that they use as previews. You know, the things that entice people to pay for music. They want to be paid for advertisements for their product.

    Just how backwards is this industry? How many years can they continue to just not get it in such an extreme way? You would have thought that maybe it would have taken a few years for them to figure out the internet, but we’re way beyond that. This entire industry seems to be run by people who don’t just not understand the internet, but are aggressive about not understanding the internet. They have their old way of doing business and the old way the world works, and they’ll be damned if any new fangled thing like a complete upheaval in the way people acquire and listen to music is going to change that.

    It’d almost be funny if the people who were really being harmed by these jackasses weren’t the artists. Bands aren’t the ones pushing for something that will only end with their best form of advertising being pulled from the iTunes Music Store (because make no mistake, that’s what will happen before Apple pays for fucking song clips). It’s these royalties idiots, the same people who almost killed off Pandora.

    So here’s the bottom line, guys: you’re doing it wrong. And you’ve been doing it wrong for a while. You need to figure out a new way of doing business, and that doesn’t mean just shifting fees around and charging where you clearly shouldn’t be charging. Earn your paychecks, because unlike the bands you purport to be representing, you’re still getting them. [CNET via Electronista]

    Source