Archive for October, 2009

Monday Inspirations

Monday, October 19th, 2009

j02276702.jpg 

Monday InspirationsHere are 3 weekly ideas for song lyric, poems, instrumental titles, photos, video, short story or anything they inspire you to create.  Use the title if you like & make something!  It is yours for free.  A gift.  :-)

 
70.  Lowered My Standards
Done Lowered My Standards
When I crossed that line
Let some shake rattle & roll come in
Now I’m doin’ some time
But the eclipse is over baby
And the sun does shine,
And the sun does shine

71.  Don’t Tax My Candy
While back I got a letter from the IRS.  I own a small business and they were informing all small businesses that from now on, candy will be taxed at the higher rate instead of the lower food rate.  To be candy the item must NOT contain flour or be kept in the refrigerator.  Oh no!!!- but that’s a great title.  Don’t Tax My Candy - don’t make it harder for me to get what I need.  The economy just melted, I need my chocolate.  Don’t Tax My Candy anymore.

72.  Back On The Higher Road
Took a wrong turn baby
and I end up with you
Took a wrong turn baby
and it brought me to you
What I left behind oh honey
Why do I do what I do?
Was the devil I say
The devil stole my heart away
When he gave some to you Lord
I better kneel down and pray
Get me - take me - put me
Back On The Higher Road
Get me - take me - put me
Now I’m Back On The Higher Road

Facebook Beats Out MySpace In Traffic - Re-post

Friday, October 16th, 2009


Facebook Traffic Soars As MySpace Tumbles
Posted: October 15, 2009
LOS ANGELES (Hypebot) – Facebook accounted for 58.59% of all U.S. visits to the top 155 social networking Web sites in September of this year - a 194% increase since September 2008 according to Hitwise. MySpace was second with 30% of social networking. The picture was far different just a year earlier in September of 2008 when MySpace accounted for 66.84% of U.S. social networking and Facebook sat at just under 20%.Twitter, which grew 1170% in the last year, still accounts for only 1.84% of all social networking traffic. The seldom talked about Tagged.com grew 47% in the last year to stay ahead of Twitter with 2.38% of social traffic.

ANALYSIS: For marketers of music, success is not just found in overall numbers, but in who is being reached. MySpace still puts more emphasis on music and attracts a younger crowd; though that too is shifting: the 18-34 demo declined 13% at MySpace and increased 10% at Facebook last year. Twitter users are more active consumers and often help shape trends and opinions.But Facebook has the eyeballs and is grabbing more every day. If there is still mass media, Facebook, at this moment, is it.

***  Personally I prefer MySpace for making Music Contacts.  If you have a MySpace account, come visit us at www.myspace.com/Songs2Share.  We listen to music over there every week.

Performers To Get Radio Royalties!!! Re-post

Friday, October 16th, 2009
FEATURE NEWS


Senate Panel OKs Bill To Make Radio Pay Fees
Posted: October 15, 2009
WASHINGTON (AP) -— Legislation to make radio stations pay royalties to performers when they broadcast their music won the Senate Judiciary Committee’s approval Thursday.Satellite radio, Internet radio and cable TV music channels already pay fees to performers and musicians, along with songwriter royalties. AM and FM radio stations just pay songwriters, not performers.


ADVERTISEMENT

Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., said the bill corrects a glaring inequity. “When we listen to music, we are enjoying the intellectual property of two creative artists — the songwriter and the performer,” he said.

The bill enjoys star-studded support. Entertainers Tony Bennett, Sheryl Crow, will.i.am, Herbie Hancock and Patti LaBelle have all made visits to Capitol Hill to lobby for it. But it also has some powerful opposition, the National Broadcasters Association, which argues that performers already benefit because radio stations playing their work drive listeners to buy music and concert tickets.

The Judiciary Committee’s approval on a voice vote sends the bill to the full Senate, but lawmakers said they still want to make changes before a vote. A similar bill is pending in the House after winning the approval of its Judiciary Committee in May.

Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, called the bill a job killer and said it would hurt small and minority-owned radio stations already struggling in the hard economic times. He said he feared many of them will just switch to all-talk formats rather than pay more royalties.

Leahy said he amended the bill to accommodate smaller broadcasters by allowing them to pay a flat fee annual fee ranging from $100 to $5,000 based on their revenues. Public radio and other noncommercial stations would pay between $100 and $1,000 in new royalties.

Larger commercial stations that make more than $1.25 million would pay a rate set by the federal Copyright Royalty Board.

Broadcasters that make less than $5 million would start paying fees three years after the bill becomes law. Stations that make more would have to start paying the fees a year from enactment.

Monday Inspirations vBlog - Play With Me

Monday, October 12th, 2009


Monday Inspirations vBlog - Play With Me

Songs2Share |MySpace Videos

Monday Inspirations

Monday, October 12th, 2009

j02276701.jpg

Monday InspirationsHere are 3 weekly ideas for song lyric, poems, instrumental titles, photos, video, short story or anything they inspire you to create.  Use the title if you like & make something!

67.  Unicorn Princess
Great title for a fantasy or children’s piece or instrumental.  When I visit a website with a variety of music to choose from, I will click on the most tantalizing title and listen.  The songwriter has 1 chance to make a great first impression and often a great title is the lead.  Write great & catchy titles to get your music noticed.  The Unicorn Princess if flying above the rainbow!!!

68.  Play With Me
Musicians “play” a lot!!!  Are YOU playing out tonight?  Also known as gigging.  Play is a healthy activity and I’m all for more participation.  So I found a helper to add her voice to the vBlog that goes by the same title.  You can watch it under Monday Inspirations vBlog.  Come on baby cakes and Play With Me.  Open to your interpretation.

69.  Do The Math
This is a popular phrase right now and is also a commanding 3 syllables.  This song lyric needs a twist to go with the title.  Make sure to pronounce the TH ending of math - you can give it it’s own syllable count for emphasis.  
You plus me equals love.  Do The Math^^^

  

Brian Wilson To Finish George Gershwin Songs/Music - Re-post

Friday, October 9th, 2009

Wilson plans to finish and record at least two songs on an album of Gershwin music that could be released next year.

Brian Wilson

Brian Wilson (Laurent Gillieron / Associated Press)

In a surprise union of two quintessentially American composers from different eras, one the 1960s mastermind of “Good Vibrations,” the other the Jazz Age creator of “Rhapsody in Blue,” former Beach Boy Brian Wilson has been authorized by the estate of George Gershwin to complete unfinished songs Gershwin left behind when he died in 1937.

He plans to finish and record at least two such pieces on an album of Gershwin music he hopes to release next year.

The Gershwin-Wilson project may strike some as an odd coupling: one New York musician famous for sophisticated 1920s and ’30s pop songs including ” ‘S Wonderful” and “Someone to Watch Over Me” as well as such expansive, classically minded compositions as “Rhapsody”; the other the driving force behind Southern California beach culture hits such as “Surfin’ U.S.A.,” “I Get Around” and “California Girls.”

But their career paths and evolution of their artistry have common threads, noted people involved with the project and some independent scholars, and that gives the proposed collaboration logic.

Todd Gershwin, George’s great-nephew and a trustee of the George Gershwin family trusts, said, “George for his time was a visionary. He certainly crossed genres and musical lines, tried things that hadn’t been done before and Brian Wilson has done exactly the same thing.”

For his part, Wilson, 67, described himself Tuesday as “thrilled to death.”

“I’m proud to be able to do it,” he said in an interview. “Hopefully I’ll be able to do them justice.”

Todd Gershwin said a collection of several dozen song fragments, ranging from “a few bars to some almost finished songs and everything in between” had been sitting virtually untouched for more than seven decades. He and other trustees began reaching out in the last year or two to find contemporary artists who might be interested in completing those musical bits and pieces.

Wilson, who says “Rhapsody in Blue” is his earliest musical memory, said the pieces he’s working with are very likely to remain as instrumentals, and that they could easily wind up as three-minute pop songs. But he’s also holding open the possibility of expanding them to more substantive pieces.

Wilson said many of them aren’t easy to evaluate.

“I can’t decipher the verse from the chorus from the bridge,” he said, “so I’m going to try to insert some new music into them. I might even write some music for an introduction.”

The Gershwin project grew out of a proposal to Wilson from Walt Disney Records for a two-album contract.

“I’m a massive Brian Wilson fan,” label president David Agnew said. “I’d always wanted to do something with him, and the Gershwin angle was something I had always thought about. In so many interviews he has mentioned Gershwin as a big influence, and if you listen to his music, that influence is obvious.”

Meanwhile, the Gershwin estate and Warner/Chappell Music, the Gershwin publisher, had been considering what to do with the many song fragments in their archive. A pianist working from manuscripts left by Gershwin recorded the music at the behest of the estate, according to Brad Rosenberger, senior vice president of catalog development and marketing for Warner/Chappell.

“When we did this, nobody had any idea that an artist like Brian Wilson was even thinking about doing something like this,” Rosenberger said.

Todd Gershwin said Wilson is the first to move ahead, but some uncompleted songs also may be used in a Gershwin tribute album that veteran engineer and producer Phil Ramone is putting together with a dozen artists for release in 2010.

Gershwin, who collaborated on most of his hit songs with his lyricist brother, Ira, stretched music of the day far beyond the compact pop song of Tin Pan Alley to more ambitious compositions incorporating elements of jazz and the classics, including “Rhapsody,” “An American in Paris” and the opera “Porgy and Bess.” He died of a brain tumor in Los Angeles at age 38 while working on a movie musical.

Wilson was one of the prime forces behind the expansion of pop music’s boundaries in the mid-’60s, taking the Beach Boys well beyond the frothy songs about surf, cars and girls. That culminated in the group’s 1966 album “Pet Sounds” and its planned follow-up, “Smile.” But “Smile” was shelved because of dissension within the band and lack of record company support, contributing to a psychological breakdown Wilson suffered in 1967. In 1999, he started on a career renaissance that led to the belated completion of “Smile” in 2004.

” ‘Smile’ is ‘Rhapsody in Blue’ circa 2004,” Rosenberger said. “It’s very experimental, very rich and very melodic and really pushed popular music.”

Chris Sampson, associate dean of USC’s Thornton School of Music, said a Gershwin-Wilson collaboration is not as far-fetched as it may seem, despite the vastly different musical landscape of the two eras.

“Where they both made their mark was extending the form,” he said. “George Gershwin was the only composer of his time to make a mark with the popular style of the time and then successfully cross over to quote-unquote serious music by extending the form beyond the basic [pop song] structure, getting into operatic styles and things of that sort.

“Brian Wilson,” Sampson added, “redefined the pop song form . . . . through his orchestrations that took music in an entirely new direction. They’re coming from two very different musical styles to end up with what I presume will be something new. That’s the exciting interaction I see in this.”

Wilson joins some illustrious company in the scope of the Gershwin project. When Mozart died at age 35 in 1791, a consortium of his contemporaries worked to fill in the incomplete portions of his Requiem. J.R.R. Tolkien’s son commissioned writer Guy Gavriel Kay to complete the novel “The Silmarillion” that his father hadn’t finished when he died.

But even in such unusual cases it’s been exceedingly rare that the person finishing the uncompleted work has been as prominent as the artist who left the work behind.

For many of those involved with the project, the prospect of one day seeing songs credited to “George Gershwin-Brian Wilson” borders on the enticingly surreal. “For me personally,” Rosenberger said, “it’s a weird dream come true.”

Story from LA Times

Music Copyright Should Be Technology Neutral = Re-post

Friday, October 9th, 2009

by Greg Sandoval….

Composers, music publishers, and songwriters have told federal lawmakers that regardless of whether music is distributed to consumers via TV, DVDs or digital download, they need legislative help to ensure they get their fair share.

Two weeks ago, I wrote a story about how some of these groups want iTunes and other Web music retailers to pay performance fees for downloads of TV shows and films. They also want online music stores to cough up fees for 30-second song previews. Those revelations didn’t go over well with many techies.

But to get a better understanding of what the artists want from Congress, I asked David Israelite, president and CEO of the National Music Publishers Association, to forward me a copy of a March 10 letter written to members of the Senate Judiciary Committee by a consortium of trade groups representing songwriters, composers, and publishers. He agreed.

In the letter, signed by Israelite and representatives of such groups as Broadcast Music Inc. (BMI); American Society of Composers, Authors & Publishers (ASCAP); and Songwriters Guild of America, the consortium wrote: “Technology should not be used to strip rights from songwriters, composers and music publishers. The choice of certain audiovisual delivery systems or methods over others should not result in a diminution of creators’ rights or royalties.”

The group later made this statement: “There is no question that copyright should be technology neutral” and asked Congress to make “a clarification to the copyright law” that specifically says that “the public performing right is implicated in digital downloads” of audiovisual works that feature music.

.. “There is no question that copyright should be technology neutral. Technology should not be used to strip rights from songwriters, composers and music publishers”–Music creators wrote in a letter to congress ..”We believe Congress intended the current law to be platform neutral,” the music consortium wrote to the senators. “The conflicting interpretations demand clarification, for without it, performing right income of songwriters, composers and publishers is seriously threatened.”

The lobbying efforts of the songwriters, composerss and music publishers continue.

All of this started with the shift in the way the public consumes media. Songwriters and publishers have for a long time collected performance fees from broadcast TV networks and film studios, but now more and more consumers are watching films and TV shows downloaded to their iPods or laptops, which at this point aren’t considered public performances.

A federal district judge court ruled in 2008 that “there is no copyright protection for the public performance right when a work containing music is digitally transmitted for future playing or viewing” the consortium wrote in the March 10 letter.

The music creators have appealed the decision.

How is this the consumer’s problem?
To critics, composers, songwriters and publishers are asking for a guarantee that they will get paid for public performances even if there isn’t any public performance.

Fred von Lohmann, senior attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an advocacy group for Web users and technology companies, disagrees with the argument that copyright should be technology neutral.

“The Copyright Act has never been technology neutral,” von Lohmann said. “The (Digital Millennium Copyright Act’s) Safe Harbors only applies to online services. There are areas that apply only to cable and satellite providers. The Copyright Act is always trying to strike a compromise.”

He added that music creators already collect other licensing fees, for such things as synchronization rights and he maintains, iTunes or other music retailers shouldn’t be responsible for making up losses for music creators.

“The copyright owner is going to get paid,” von Lohmann said. “Whether it’s called a performance or a reproduction the copyright owner is going to get paid. This is just a turf war between middlemen about who is going to take a piece off the top. The copyright office has tried to broker some sort of solution between the various parties for years with little success.

“We’ll get some more guidance from the courts soon,” he continued, “but I doubt that will be the last word. As (Israelite’s) letter suggests the parties can all go fight it out in Congress now.” 

Story from CNET

Music Retailers Pursue Niches

Friday, October 9th, 2009

.. Record Stores: Out of Sight, Not Obsolete ..

J B Reed for The New York Times

Charlie Grappone, who continues to sell albums even though his store, Vinylmania, closed in 2007. He uses the offices of a distributor, Downtown 161. 

Published: September 29, 2009

It was Wednesday at Downtown 161, and that meant it was Vinylmania day.

Most of the time Downtown 161, a record distributor in Lower Manhattan, is off limits to the public. But once a week it becomes an unusual kind of record store for friends of Vinylmania, a Greenwich Village shop that closed in 2007. Customers run their hands over items in fancy packaging, chat with the seller and brag about their collections — all the typical stuff that grows more endangered every time another store closes.

“In the old days, when I was really selling a lot of records, this was verboten,” said Charlie Grappone, a dance-music specialist who opened Vinylmania in 1978. “You would never let people off the street into a wholesale distributor. Because why would they buy in a store if they could come in here? But it’s changed now. There aren’t any stores left.”

He’s exaggerating, of course: there are still dozens of stores in Manhattan alone. But thousands have vanished around the country in recent years, following the rise of digital music and the cliff-dive of CD sales. In New York the losses this year have included two Virgin Megastores and Etherea in the East Village; the three-level Mondo Kim’s has moved and consolidated into one considerably less mondo floor.

Yet some former store owners have not given up so easily — or, left with thousands of unsold records, cannot — and continue to serve their customers in unconventional ways. Mr. Grappone has been hosting the Vinylmania sales almost every week since his store closed; its 100th gathering will be on Wednesday. Others, including the garage-rock haven Midnight Records and the reggae outlet Jammyland, sell by appointment at their owners’ homes.

At Downtown 161 one sunny Wednesday recently, patrons greeted one another with hugs, then a few minutes later could be spotted with armfuls of records, hovering intently over the turntables there. In one corner of the small office was a simulacrum of Mr. Grappone’s old store, complete with wall racks. The sales began as an invitation-only event for Vinylmania’s 100 or so top spenders. Word has since gotten out, and a new face appears now and then, but still, the population of 12-inch dance collectors is not large. (Mr. Grappone also sells CDs, but only a few.)

To survive in a market in which most products are just a click away, the dealers serve micro-niches, catering to ever fewer but more discriminating customers. One Vinylmania shopper, Jusoong Sun, 47, said he preferred the tactile and social aspects of nonvirtual retail: “To me the whole experience of buying is coming here and feeling the record, putting on the turntable. It’s still tangible.” There are other benefits to in-person shopping: Mr. Sun snagged an autographed test pressing of a new single by a producer, Antonio Ocasio, who stopped in.

J. D. Martignon, 57, a wry and wiry Frenchman who opened Midnight Records in Chelsea in 1984, has continued to sell in his nearby apartment since the store closed five years ago, a victim of rising rents and a lengthy legal battle with the Recording Industry Association of America over bootlegs. The apartment is laid out much like his old store, with alphabetized bins of LPs for browsing. Garage-rock fanzines are arranged by a window, and even the kitchen has some vinyl on display.

Mr. Martignon said he got a customer or so each day; sometimes they just browse, but sometimes a whale comes along. “I get these Japanese guys that spend a few thousand bucks,” he said. “All out-of-print rockabilly stuff.”

Some sellers take appointments simply to unload their old stock. In March Richard Kim, 36, closed Etherea, which carried a range of alternative and electronic music, but he still has at least 6,000 albums, he estimated, and keeps them in two plain rooms in a Brooklyn office building, occasionally letting in an old customer who tracked him down. He said he had no interest in staying in the music business and wanted to liquidate his collection: he is training to be an emergency medical technician.

Ira Heaps ran the tiny East Village reggae shop Jammyland from 1992 until last year, and now sells his leftovers in his even tinier apartment nearby. Boxes of albums and singles fill up the space beneath a loft bed, and the walls are lined with yet more boxes. Mr. Heaps said old customers sought him out after the store closed.

“It started with D.J. friends of mine,” he said. “ ‘Come on, what happened to your stuff?’ I said mainly it’s in my apartment. They said, ‘Can we come over?’ I said sure.” Mr. Heaps, 45, still sounds bitter about the demise of his store. “Jammyland ruined me,” he said. “I gave it 16 years of my life. It ruined two marriages. I have nothing to show for it.”

Actually, what he has to show for it is encyclopedic knowledge — he rhapsodized for 15 minutes about “Bam Bam,” a 1982 hit by Sister Nancy, and would not let a reporter leave without buying a dozen carefully chosen singles — and a central position in a network of collectors who, he said, found him even during a period when he had disconnected his phone.

And Mr. Heaps said he simply liked hanging out with fellow music lovers, a sentiment echoed by many former store owners. Mr. Grappone, a cheerful 58-year-old who has hundreds of thousands of records in storage, said he did most of his business through eBay and other online outlets, but liked to see his old customers. And then there’s the thrill of handling cash. “There’s nothing like it,” Mr. Grappone said, vigorously chewing his gum as he counted out the bills for a $158 sale.

Mr. Martignon was more ambivalent. He started selling records out of his apartment in 1978, and said that after the store closed, “I thought maybe the best thing is to go back to my roots.”

“But at this point it’s a little boring to be in the same place all the time, working there and sleeping there,” he continued, pointing to the two contiguous zones of his apartment.

Will he continue to do it, though?

“Yeah,” he said with a shrug. “Why not?”

Source: NY Times

Women More Ravenous For Music Sites - Re-post

Friday, October 9th, 2009

Women More Ravenous for Music Sites, Nielsen

Oct 1, 2009

-By Ken Hein

mw/photos/stylus/33754-GENERIC_People_Laptop.jpg

Whether checking on rapper Fabolous’ health scare or Alicia Keys love life, women are far more likely to be heading to music news or listening sites than men, according to Nielsen NetView data.

In August, women made up 56.1 percent of the Web traffic to music sites. Overall, music sites pulled in 42.5 million unique female visitors last month.
 
While it might seem like young girls would be scouring sites for the latest news on the Jonas Brothers, it is actually women 35-60 who make up about a third of visitors to music sites.
 
Females age 35-49 make up the largest group. More than 14.5 million women within that demographic visited online music sites in August. This made up 19.2 percent of all visitors to music sites during the month.
 
Less than a fifth (15.6 percent) of U.S. females 18 or older said they purchased music online within the past six months. Sixteen percent said they bought a music offline during the same span, per Nielsen@Plan Fall 2009 Survey. Slightly more than 8 percent of women watched or listened to music online.
 
The top two sites visited by women for the month of August were: AOL Music (11.8 million unique visitors) and Yahoo Music (9.9 million). MSN Music was a distant third with a unique audience of 3.9 million.

Mediaweek is a unit of the Nielsen Co.

China Appeals WTO Ruling on…Music… Re-Post

Wednesday, October 7th, 2009


Category: Music

China Appeals WTO Ruling on Book, Film, Music Imports (Update3)



By Jennifer M. Freedman

Sept. 22 (Bloomberg) — China appealed a World Trade Organization ruling that found its curbs on the sale of books, films and music from the U.S. are unfair.

WTO judges concluded on Aug. 12 that China was violating its free-trade commitments by requiring importers to channel foreign publications and audiovisual products through state-run companies. The panel also urged China to allow foreign companies to sell music over the Internet, which would be a boon for Apple Inc., with its iTunes software.

“The audiovisual case touches upon China’s entire censorship/information-control system,” said Iana Dreyer, a trade analyst at the European Centre for International Political Economy in Brussels. “Whereas there is no need for a trading monopoly to import publications and audiovisual products, it’s easier to keep control over what information the Chinese receive when there’s an import monopoly. China is trying to gain time.”

U.S.-Chinese trade relations have soured amid allegations about market-access restrictions, trade protectionism, copyright infringement, currency manipulation and claims that Chinese exporters are undercutting higher-cost American manufacturers. The U.S. has lodged eight complaints against China at the Geneva-based WTO — more than any other government — while four of China’s five trade complaints are against the U.S.

While China previously tended to backtrack when a panel was requested and settle matters diplomatically, the Asian nation has become more confident about legal battles and now makes full use of the WTO’s dispute settlement system, said Tu Xinquan, a deputy director at the China Institute for WTO Studies at the University of International Business and Economics in Beijing.

Trade Surplus

“China will become more active in using the WTO rules to defend itself as the nation’s huge trade surplus makes it one of the biggest targets for trade disputes,” he said. “China wants to gain results that are more favorable to the nation via the appeal, because this case is about more sensitive subjects.”

The U.S., the world’s biggest exporter of entertainment products, sees higher sales of cultural goods as a way to narrow its trade deficit with China, which totaled $103 billion in the first half of 2009. While foreign films and music are popular in China, suppliers face competition from the country’s thriving black market. President Barack Obama’s trade chief, Ron Kirk, has made getting China, Russia and other nations to clamp down on piracy of American-made goods one of his top goals.

Lost Revenue

China’s copying of movies, music and software cost companies $2.2 billion in 2006 sales, according to an estimate by lobby groups representing Microsoft Corp., Walt Disney Co. and Vivendi SA.

Revenue generated from films in China climbed 27 percent last year to 4.2 billion yuan ($615 million), according to the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television. Foreign movies grossed 1.7 billion yuan, up 8 percent from 2007.

Imported films can be distributed only by two state-owned enterprises, a unit of China Film Group and Huaxia Film Distribution Co. China Film controls most of the 20 import licenses that grant foreign films the right to a modest slice of their box-office earnings, usually about 13 percent.

While WTO judges didn’t rule against the import quota of 20 foreign films a year, they said China Film “can no longer be the monopoly importer.” The panel also agreed that China has the right to ban foreign films and publications that government censors deem objectionable. China bans foreign social networking Web sites such as Facebook and Twitter.

‘Very Unwelcome’

The Obama administration won’t lodge an appeal in the case, said Deborah Mesloh, a spokeswoman with the U.S. Trade Representative’s office in Washington. WTO appellate judges have up to 90 days to rule on China’s appeal. If the WTO’s August ruling is upheld, China will have to change the way it imports audiovisual products or face retaliatory trade measures from the U.S.

“This is very unwelcome in a period when China is desperate to keep its exports flowing and when the U.S. is only too keen to restrict trade with China,” Dreyer said. “However, since the case is a very borderline case with important political ramifications, it is uncertain whether China would be diligent in changing its practices.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Jennifer M. Freedman in Geneva at jfreedman@bloomberg.net.

Source: Bloomberg